“We are entering with goodwill into further negotiations with the P5+1 group and we want to reach an agreement… but we are not willing to pay any price,” said Iranian negotiator Majid Takht Ravanchi.
It may not be unreasonable to interpret this to mean that Iran is unwilling to put any further concessions on the table. In fact, Ravanchi also denied that Iran has any responsibility for Western concerns over a nuclear weapons program, dismissing all demands for compromise as part of what the state-affiliated Tasnim News Agency called and “Iranophobic plot” by “some countries.”
In keeping with this denial of responsibility, Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has previously declared that neither uranium enrichment capacity nor ballistic missile production will be reduced, and that in fact Iran plans to dramatically expand its stockpile of enrichment centrifuges.
Thus, despite positive public statements, the prospects for a successful deal generally seem rather remote – and this sentiment may even be shared by the pragmatists in the Rouhani administration who have spearheaded a strategy of Western outreach in order to try to secure the end of US-led economic sanctions. World Politics Review posted an article on Monday summing up some recent developments in a supposed conflict between those pragmatists and the hardliners who prefer a strategy of open-conflict with the West.
While pointedly avoiding negative remarks about his critics and political adversaries as a whole, Rouhani accused unnamed sub-groups of trying to actively sabotage the negotiations. But since Supreme Leader Khamenei has been at the head of the ultimatums that continue to imperil a deal, and since Khamenei has also issued a number of combative statements about the US during the negotiation period, it is difficult to imagine that there is a sub-group of “saboteurs” who do not have the blessing of the supreme leader.